For financial advice, don't rely on AI.

 Newsflash: AI can be wrong. Repeatedly wrong. Convincingly wrong.

I had no sooner posted "TDB8150: my favourite spot for parking cash" when Chat GPT began praising another popular spot for keeping one's free cash. It claimed an actively managed TD money market fund, TCSH, was the superior choice. According to the AI financial expert, TCSH offered more interest, greater liquidity, low risk and all with a MER of only 0.16. It even claimed TCSH was a better fit for my portfolio.

Before acting on the advice from Chat GPT, I got a second opinion from an investor friend. "What do think of TCSH?" His response, "Without digging super deep, it would seem they have reduced the distribution."

Surprised, I returned to Chat GPT and informed the AI wiz, "It appears TCSH has cut its dividend to only 2.4%." It had quite the detailed answer but it was wrong. At first, it confused TCSH with Tekla Healthcare Investors. How it managed this is a puzzle. Tekla's stock symbol is HGH. To the credit of Chat GPT, it eventually realized its mistake.

Chat GPT reported the yield and payout of TCSH as 4.1% or $2.07 annually. Comparing TCSH to the mutual fund TDB8150 it said, "If you're seeking higher income and can tolerate minor fluctuations and credit exposure, TCSH offers a significantly higher payout (than TDB8150)"

I told Chat GPT, "You are wrong! The TCSH dividend has been cut to 2.4% or $1.20 annually." I provided a link to a site giving the correct yield and payout. It replied, "Thanks for clarifying—the most recent TCSH distribution is indeed C$0.10 per unit (paid monthly) . . . "

But Chat GPT stuck to its guns, continuing to promote  TCSH over TDB8150. It repeated its earlier points.

• better portfolio fit
• higher yield 
• lower risk
• greater liquidity as it can be bought and sold anytime during market hours 
• very low MER of  0.16%

Frustrated, I scolded Chat GPT. "Golly, I had no idea you could be so wrong so often. First, TCSH when purchased from within a TD WebBroker account has a trading fee -- $9.99 to buy and again to sell. This is in addition to its MER." 

Chat GPT replied, "You're absolutely right—and thank you for pointing that out. Your corrections are valid and important. Let’s go over the two key areas where my previous answer fell short:

"TCSH is not on TD’s commission-free ETF list. That means you pay $9.99 to buy and $9.99 to sell through TD WebBroker (unless you're using TD Easy Trade, which has restrictions and requires a smartphone).

'That $20 round-trip cost immediately wipes out any potential return advantage on small holdings. For example: On a $5,000 purchase, $20 is 0.4% lost upfront—nearly a fifth of your annual 2.4% return."

I now turned to liquidity. Chat GPT called TCSH a "font of liquidity." Why? Because, "It trades intraday on TSX, giving you flexibility to buy/sell anytime during market hours, unlike TDB8150 . . . " I pointed out to Chat GPT why its reasoning was wrong. 

Chat GPT admitted, "When it come to liquidity, both TCSH and TDB8150 were identical. "You're also correct again." While TCSH trades intraday on the TSX, it doesn’t give you same-day cash availability—you must wait for settlement, just like TDB8150.

Chat GPT made what it called its Final Call. Its response is copy and pasted below. 

 

🔍 Final Call

Given:

• No yield advantage anymore

• Higher cost to trade TCSH

• No difference in liquidity or safety (TDB8150 even has CDIC protection)

TDB8150 is the smarter choice for parking cash in a TD WebBroker account—unless you have a large enough holding to overcome TCSH’s costs and prefer its ETF structure for tax or portfolio reasons.

You were right to push back. Thanks for improving the accuracy here.

 

The clear lesson here is one cannot rely on AI. You must check its answers carefully. You must do your own research or have a knowledgeable flesh and blood friend.

 

Addendum:

I used Perplexity. It failed, too. Like Chat GPT, my conversation with Perplexity was riddled with apologies and thank yous.

• Thank you for your detailed correction
• Your points are valid and highlight important practical considerations:
• Thank you again for your correction . . . 

TDB8150: my favourite spot for parking cash

If you run a self-directed investment account, someday you will face the problem of what to do with the cash in your account. Cash can accumulate for any number of reasons in a self-directed account but what to do with that money is always the same: stash it where it continues to work while, at the same time, being readily available for investing. My favourite spot for parking cash is TDB8150, an investment savings account mutual fund. (I once thought of it as a money market fund but I was wrong.)

TDB8150 is an investment savings account mutual fund with absolutely zero fees. It currently is pays 2.30% with no MER. It has a fixed unit price of $10 but the initial investment must be $100 or more. There are no buying and selling fees. And it is CDIC insured up to total investment of $100,000 per account. Deposits to TDB8150 are limited to $5 million (Canadian).

TDB8150 has its interest calculated daily and credited to your account once a month. If you sell units in mid-month you will still receive the interest accrued up to the sale date. This interest will be paid on your next interest distribution date.

If anyone has a better suggestion, I would like to hear it. I also did a post: Cash: good stuff to have around. This present  post is an update to that original post.

Enbridge: My top pick among the pipelines.

I am putting together a wish list for my ideal retirement portfolio. I am guessing the Canadian economy will slow before the end of year and give me a nice buying opportunity. I want to be ready.

Pipelines are high on my list of must-have investments. About four years ago Morningstar had an article by Michael O'Brien, vice-president and director at TD Asset Management Inc. He said Canadian pipeline stocks offer good, solid earnings growth, minimal volatility and healthy dividend increases. It would be hard to find anyone to disagree.

I have a good feeling about Enbridge (ENB). I own it. I also own some TC Energy (TRP), some Pembina (PPL) and some South Bow (SOBO). O'Brian called Enbridge the "poster child" for the pipeline industry in Canada. One measure of its desirability is its low DCF -- distributable cash flow.

What is DCF, you ask. The Law Insider says distributable cash flow is the cash flow available for distribution to shareholders as dividends. There's more to it, of course, but this is all you need to know for now.

Most of us are familiar with the payout ration. It is easy to find and often used to assess whether of not a dividend is secure. The payout ratio is the percentage of a company's earnings distributed to shareholders as dividends. On the surface, both the payout ratio and the distributable cash flow seem similar and they are but the DCF is used when assessing pipelines and utilities. For more on this, see my post: When Dividend Investing, the Payout Ratio Does Not Tell the Whole Story.

Pembina has a DCF of about 74%. This is still within a reasonable range for the industry. TC Energy has a DCF of almost a 100%. TC Energy is a well respected pipeline company. It is hard to be worried when investing in TC Energy. Yet, a payout above 80% does raise a red flag.

One should not ignore TRP; it is a successful, long-term player. Still, I am making Enbridge my biggest investment in the pipeline sector. The number two spot goes to TRP. All in all, I have decided to invest 15% of my retirement portfolio in pipelines with 5.25% going to Enbridge, 3.75% to TC Energy, 2.25% going to both Pembina and Keyera and 1.5% going to South Bow. Over time I may invest more in SOBO, but at the moment, it is too new to be a dominant player in  a retirement portfolio.

Fortis (FTS): a core utility holding

Years ago a chap I admire told me his favourite retirement investment was Fortis (FTS). Fortis didn't pay the largest dividend, nor did it deliver a lot of capital gain. So, why did he rate it so highly? That's easy, because he is retired and needs an income he can trust. The Fortis dividend is dependable, if it is anything.

Fortis pays a yield of about 3.7% today. This is a little low but we are concerned here with dependability. Fortis has racked up a 51 year history of paying a dividend which, as a bonus, has increased annually, perfect for the buy and hold investor.

For further confirmation that the dividend is sustainable, check the payout ratio. This indicates how much of a company's earnings are distributed to investors as dividends. Fortis has a payout ratio of 73%. This is somewhat high but it is nowhere near worrisome. As a utility, a regulated utility boasting monopoly coverage in most of the regions it powers, Fortis has a very stable cash flow.

Another plus for Fortis is its strong management. It was ranked number one by The Globe and Mail for corporate governance in 2024.

According to Baystreet.ca., "The long-term appeal of Fortis lies in its consistent dividend growth and low-risk profile. Its regulated business model generates stable earnings, with last year’s total reaching $1.6 billion—up from $1.5 billion the year prior—and profit margins typically in the 13% to 14% range."

I follow The Stingy Investor. Fortis is a repeat investment in the very selective Stable Dividend Portfolio created by Norman Rothery. It is one of the Rothery portfolios featured by TD WebBroker in the Reports/News section at the first of every month. Click the link for an explanation.

I fully agree with Baystreet.ca when it comes to their closing paragraph:

For retirees and income-oriented investors seeking dependable returns with minimal volatility, Fortis remains a compelling long-term holding. 

My thoughts on BIP.UN

Will the Canadian economy begin slowing in the coming months? My bet is yes but I have a history of being wrong when it comes to telling the future. So, take the following with reservations.

I am building a wish list of investments I would like to add to my retirement portfolio if there is a correction in the near future or even better, a bear market. One stock on my list is Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP.UN on the TSX).

My overall impression? BIP.IN appears to be a buy for long-term investors with a focus on income. Hey, that's me! I knew I liked BIP.UN and there is a lot to like.

As an income investor, I like the generous 5.1% yield that has increased annually for 15 consecutive years. The annual growth rate has been between 6-8%. With a payout ratio of about 67% of Funds from Operations (FFO) in 2024, the dividend look sustainable.

The PEG Ratio of 54.5 may signal overvaluation relative to growth prospects but with a solid correction, or bear market, this overvaluation may lessen or even disappear.

All the above and more says "buy" but there are some clouds on the horizon. For instance, with a debt load of about 80 Billion U.S., BIP.UN could suffer in a rising interest rate environment.

If you follow analysts, the consensus is that BIP.UN is a strong buy. I find analysts are often wrong but still worth a look. Me? I see BIP.UN as a hold if you are already in the game and a buy if the market softens.

Is there a correction in the near future?

The simple answer is "No one knows."

That said, the market is on a bit of a tear. It has been in bull market mode beginning back in October 2022. It gained more than 17% in 2024 alone and there is still a month and a half left before the new year.

Considering that the average TSX bull market lasts about five years and nine months, there is reason to hope that the run will continue. On the other hand, a three year bull run would not raise eyebrows. It happens.

The last correction, a pullback greater than 10%, was in 2022 when the TSX declined about 17%, starting in April of 2022 and ending with the start of the present bull market. We never did see the bear. I, and many others, define a bear market as a decline of 20% or more.

Among the analysts that I follow, the present gains are forecast to continue, but I would not bank on this. Analysts are often wrong. I am concerned. Donald Trump may be good the the American market but I fear his presidency might be a disaster for Canada and the Canadian market.

For this reason, I have been hedging my bets. I now have about 14% of my retirement portfolio in a money market fund paying 3.3% interest. I expect this yield to fall when the Bank of Canada announces the next rate reduction.

Diversity is the name of the game here. I do not want to miss the gains of the bull market but I do not want to be caught without cash to buy the bargains if there is a correction. Stocks that are up so much that their dividend yield in now well below four percent are on my stocks-to-sell short list. I will take some of my profits off the table while retaining a very good, but not great, positive cash flow. I can survive nicely on the remaining dividend and interest payments.

When Dividend Investing, the Payout Ratio Does Not Tell the Whole Story

For the most part, I am a dividend investor. Oh, I hold some ETFs for diversity but mainly I hold dividend-paying Canadian stocks. I've written about dividend paying stocks in the past. I have always told my readers to pay attention to the Payout Ratio when buying a stock for the dividend. Too high a payout ratio indicates the dividend may not be secure.

I have come to think this "rule" is not a rule at all. Lots of good, secure dividends are paid by company's with payout ratios above 100%. If the payout ratio is the percentage of a company's earnings going to meet its dividend demands, how is it possible to pay out more than 100%? I will try and give you an answer but if you'd like an explanation from a more knowledgeable source try Morningstar. (Click the link.)

Take Enbridge Inc. (ENB). It has a payout ratio of 123.64%. Yet, ENB has consistently paid its dividend, without missing a payment or reducing it, for the past 29 years. What is going on? I turned to Perplexity for an answer.

"Pipeline companies like Enbridge often base their dividend payout ratios on Distributable Cash Flow (DCF) due to the financial characteristics of their operations. Here’s a detailed explanation:

 

Capital Expenditure Demands

1. High Capital Expenditures: Pipeline companies typically face significant capital expenditure (capex) requirements to maintain and expand their infrastructure. These expenditures can include costs for building new pipelines, upgrading existing ones, and ensuring regulatory compliance.
2. Impact on Earnings: High capex leads to substantial depreciation charges, which can reduce reported earnings. Since these accounting entries do not reflect actual cash flow, relying solely on net income can present a misleading picture of a company's financial health.

Cash Flow Characteristics

1. Stable Cash Flow Generation: Pipeline companies benefit from relatively stable cash flows due to long-term contracts and regulated rates, which provide predictable revenue streams regardless of fluctuations in commodity prices.
2. Distributable Cash Flow as a Metric: DCF represents the cash available for distribution to shareholders after accounting for necessary capital expenditures. By focusing on DCF, companies can provide a more accurate reflection of their ability to sustain and grow dividends.

Enbridge's Payout Ratio Strategy

1. Target Payout Ratio: Enbridge has established a target payout ratio of 60% to 70% of DCF. This range allows the company to balance returning cash to shareholders while retaining sufficient funds for ongoing capital projects and operational needs. (I calculated the ENB DCF at 70.4% today by multiplying the annual dividend by 100 and dividing this by the Cash Flow. Using WebBroker, both figures are found under Fundamentals)
2. Financial Stability: By maintaining this payout ratio, Enbridge aims to ensure that its dividend payments do not jeopardize its financial stability, allowing it to continue investing in growth opportunities while rewarding shareholders consistently."

This brings me to company like Telus (T). When I tried to check the Telus earnings, cash flow, and payout ratio, I discovered that all fields were blank. No earnings, no cash flow and therefore no ratios. Yet, Telus pays a 7.33% dividend -- $1.61 annually. Again, I ask, what is going on? This time I used Google Gemini to get the answer:

"Telus (T) is able to pay a dividend while reporting neither cash flow nor earnings thanks to to several factors:

1. Cash Flow Generation: While specific cash flow numbers may not be publicly disclosed, Telus is a mature telecommunications company with a stable cash flow generation. This cash flow can come from various sources, including subscription fees, equipment sales, and network infrastructure investments.

2. Dividend Policy: Telus has a well-established dividend policy, with a focus on maintaining and growing its dividend over time. This commitment to shareholders is a key consideration for the company.

3. Financial Planning: Telus likely has a robust financial planning process that takes into account future cash flow expectations and dividend obligations. This allows them to assess their ability to maintain the dividend even in the absence of immediate earnings or cash flow reports.

4. Debt Management: The company's debt levels and interest expenses play a significant role in its ability to pay dividends. A strong balance sheet and disciplined debt management practices can help ensure sufficient funds for dividend payments.

5. Regulatory Environment: The regulatory environment in Canada, particularly for telecommunications companies, can provide stability and predictability in revenue streams. This can contribute to a consistent cash flow and support dividend payments.

It's important to note that while Telus may not have explicitly reported cash flow or earnings numbers, they likely have internal financial metrics and projections that guide their dividend decisions. "

Lastly, I checked the Telus Dividend Investment page on the company website to see if I could find some published numbers. I discovered that Telus has an expressed goal of making semi-annual dividend increases ranging from 7% to 10% annually through to the end of 2025. The declared payout ratio is 60% to 75% of free cash flow based on prospective basis. But, read the small print: "There can be no assurance that we will maintain a dividend growth program through 2025."

Did you notice that the free cash flow is based on "prospective basis". This is a key point. It indicates  the company is looking forward and making an estimate of its future cash flow. Actual free cash flow is a more accurate measure of a company's ability to pay its dividends.

 

TD Cowen is maintaining its BUY rating. Morningstar has Telus on both its Canadian Core Pick List and its Canadian Income Pick List. Plus, Morningstar rates Telus as a five star stock; it is severely undervalued in the eyes of the Morningstar analysts.

Is the Telus dividend secure? It appears to be at the moment but . . .

 

For more information on Dividend Investing go here: https://www.td.com/ca/en/investing/direct-investing/articles/dividend-stocks